I believe in God, but that does not mean that I agree with the intelligent design model creation.Has anyone ever wondered where is the intelligence to design? The fact that the "design" is full of errors, supporting the theory of the evolutionary process evolution.The is a much better explanation of all things that go wrong in nature, which is intelligent design. For example, what intelligent designer could do so almost all zebras and gazelles eventually strangled to death by lions? What kind of way is this to continue? And hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes and tsunamis have killed millions of people since the beginning of time. But perhaps one of the biggest mistakes in the "design" is that the life of our beloved pet dogs is one fifth of humans. What definition deal.By premiums, the designer of the universe has an infinite intelligence. Therefore, assuming that there is a designer, how frustrated this creative things so wrong? Some examples: 1) The "design" is penetrated by the flies, mosquitoes, gnats, spiders, cockroaches, termites and billions of other pests and parasites that serve no purpose other than to infect and scare people , destroy houses and crops, and create more discomfort. Why an intelligent designer create billions nasty parasites, including viruses and bacteria? The intelligent design advocates might argue that the pests are the food source for birds, and that deadly microbes are designer fashion to punish humans for being so bad. Well, an intelligent designer would have to do so birds may feed on leaves and grass. Proponents of intelligent design then I would say that if all the birds were fed on leaves and grass, no trees have beautiful or majestic mountains. However, an intelligent designer would have to do for the birds need to eat six times a year or vegetation to grow back instantly! As for the deadly virus, if the designer wanted man to die as punishment, I think the designer just dropping people like flies, without a viral infection, and innocent children would be spared this "punishment". 2) The "design" that makes it too easy for humans to procreate, thus creating millions of starving, dying children, and millions of unwanted and abandoned babies were planned for. Although a woman is "fertile" only a few times each month, this, combined with man's ability to produce hundreds of millions of sperm a day, means that humans easily multiply beyond their ability to care for themselves. An intelligent designer would have made women of childbearing age only a few times a year, men produce sperm much less. Advocates of intelligent design argue that if this were so, the human species would not have survived. But an intelligent designer would have known the exact balance of fertility and sperm count to keep the species, without perpetuating the overpopulation. Some proponents of intelligent design may believe that the "original sin" is why overpopulation and unwanted / unplanned. But if this is so, then how do they explain the overpopulation of all the plagues described in item # 1? Not to mention the overpopulation of rodents? 3) In the general population, women are much physically weaker than men. However, men are designed to penetrate a woman. Due to the strong design of a man, he is easily able to rape women. An intelligent designer would have made the women stronger than men (without looking like men), it would be extremely difficult for a man to rape a woman. Some proponents of intelligent design argue that, once again, the original sin is guilty of corrupt conduct. This is always an easy argument to fall back. But a man who violates it because-according to studies and statistics, he had to endure abuse in childhood. If original sin is the explanation, then there would be fewer offenders emerging from childhood as large as those that come from bad childhoods.4) Although many diseases are caused by lifestyle, what about the tens of thousands of babies born sick or deformed due to genetic defects each year? And millions of adults suffer from genetic diseases caused. Some design, huh! Perhaps "random" can be a good explanation for the disaster in this world is? It's not as "neat" as you think. Another way of thinking is in terms of "theistic evolution," the belief that God had a hand in evolution. The order of creation as described in Genesis, is parallel to the order described by evolutionary theory.